Point Object vs. Array

#1
Why does IntelliCAD have no 3-dim array for simple points? In my opinion, very often, it is much easier define an array for points. Or, maybe, there should be a casting between the point object and an array (or is there any, and I didnt found it?).

Thanks for reading

Tom

#2
Tom_H,

To be able to have a point object with x, y and z properties is in my opinon easier to use.

I suppose it gets down to what you are used to and this is just one of the differences between AutoCAD and IntelliCAD's object model.



------------------
Regards
John Finlay

#3
Thanks for your answer.

Yes, I compare AutoCAD's and IntelliCAD's object model.

In my opinion, IntelliCAD, BricsCad and all the other programs have two disadvantages:

- not exactly the same ActiveX object model, so AutoCAD VB/VBA code is not 'ready to run' in IntelliCAD; ok, so exact as possible is also ok

- the biggest disadvantage is the missing arx library; the OpenDWG library is very good, but AutoCAD's arx is free, with very much examples, and an very active newsgroup; I have many arx programs, it is an horror to convert all the stuff to the OpenDWG library. New arx programs, I try to write them so, that it is easier to adopt them to OpenDWG. And, sorry, ADS or SDS is not state of the art.

Sorry for the bad English.

Tom