Search found 10 matches

Go to advanced search

Display posts from previous
Sort by

found the problem ....

TRIM still drive me nuts..,
but now I recognized by reading another post, that the TRIM command only works well in the UCS WOrld coordinate system.
I checked this - and found that if I change to the UCS World, the TRIM command is doing what I expect.

best regards Karlheinz

after exporting this file to dxf and importing it as a new drawing, everything works fine now - mmh, very strange!!

again best regards

Karlheinz

mmh, I just checked in an empty drawing in 6.19 and also in 6.20 - There it works fine in both versions, so I can confirm your posts above - but in my bigger drawing it works unfortunately wrong ... and there it still drives me nuts... Can I send this drawing to anybody for verification? regards Kar...

First of all: thanks for your replies! Do you also use the latest Version? I am using the 6.2.36.1, Premium Edition. I also just verified the behavior as posted above without loaded any LISP routines, and I still have this strange behavior, that the "wrong" parts of the Polyline is trimmed...

TRIM command drives me nuts

Sorry for repeating this topic, but the implementation of the trim command drives me nuts: It unfortunately depends on polylines on their direction. Just do the following: 1) draw one horizontal polyline, just with two points from left to right. 2) draw another polyline from top to bottom in this wa...

Thanks for your answer, John. I still have admin rights on my computer, but it wont work - anyway, I have upgraded now my 6.1PE to 6.2PE and I was able to install the 6.2PE. Unfortunately, the trim command still works "strange", it cuts, depending on the direction of the polyline, the wron...

Demo 6.2 will not install

I like to try the demo 6.2 to see if a few bugs are remove (for example, a few line styles will not be printed correct to a PDF). Unfortunately the demo could not be installed on my WinXp machine with 1GB main memory. (access violation at address 7c93ae22 in module 'ntdll.dll') …... Any Ideas? Thank...

Hello Cad_B, hello John: Thanks for feedback - yes, it was the missing z value, yes, CAD_B, you are right, there is a redundant calculation - with either expanding the return list with the z value or simply staying at the polar calculation, it works fine! John, your simple half is nearly equal to my...

Go to advanced search